You’ve seen this before: An athlete takes a hit, seems a little off, and by the time you get to him, he’s already saying he’s fine. (He’s not.) And now there’s a coach a few feet away who needs him for the next series, or a parent who’s already texting about the recruiting camp next weekend, and both of them are looking at you like you’re the only thing standing between being “fine” and getting back in the game.

Which, technically speaking, you are. Same day return to play is off the table once a concussion is suspected, we know this. Adolescent athletes carry the highest risk of second impact syndrome, and it’s why “he seems fine” isn’t what we go off of. 

Back in July, we tackled the same kind of pushback with heat modifications (*link July blog*). Here’s the concussion version of that blog: what to say when someone outside your scope decides they know better than the protocol in the moment, based on who’s asking and how much patience you’ve got left.


COMMENT 1: “He said he’s fine, put him back in.”

To a coach, first ask: “I hear you, and I know you need him. But once I suspect a concussion, the decision isn’t mine to un-make just because he says he feels okay. State law and our return-to-play protocol both require he’s cleared by a physician before he’s back on this field, not back in the moment.” (Feel free to cite your state or league’s specific guidelines, too!)

To a coach who pushes a second time: “I get that this puts you in a tough spot for the rest of the game. It puts us in a tougher one if I clear him and I’m wrong.”

The one you say in the group chat after: “He also said he was fine when he tried to run the wrong way to the sideline.”


COMMENT 2: “This happened before and he was back in the next series.”

Educational: “That’s actually part of why I’m being careful now. A prior concussion raises the risk for this one being worse, and it raises the risk of second impact syndrome specifically. What happened last time isn’t a reason to move faster.”

Diplomatic: “I know that’s the history, and I know it feels inconsistent. The protocol’s the same for him as it is for every athlete, every time, not because I don’t trust him, but because this isn’t something you can eyeball from the sideline.”

Sarcastic: “Last time worked out. That’s not actually the bar we’re supposed to be using.”


COMMENT 3: “It’s not like he got knocked out.”

Educational: “Loss of consciousness happens in a small minority of concussions. Most look exactly like this: a hit, some confusion, symptoms that show up gradually. Waiting for someone to get knocked out to take it seriously means missing almost every real one.”

Diplomatic: “I know it doesn’t look as dramatic as what you picture when you hear ‘concussion.’ That’s honestly the tricky part of this injury; it rarely looks like the movie version.”

Sarcastic: “Correct. It’s much scarier than that, which is the problem.”


COMMENT 4: “Can you clear him for Saturday, we’ve got scouts coming.”

Educational: “I want that opportunity for him too. But return to play has to follow a graduated protocol, with each step checked against symptoms, and it has to end with a physician’s clearance. There isn’t a version of this where I can fast-track it for a single game, even one that matters this much.”

Diplomatic: “I know how much this game means, and I wish I had better news. The fastest path back to the field is actually following the steps in order. Skipping ahead is usually what sets a kid back further.”

Sarcastic: (Skip this one with a parent. Save it for the group chat after.)


COMMENT 5: “Isn’t this overkill? He just had his bell rung.”

Educational: “I try to steer away from that language for exactly this reason; it undersells what’s happening. This is a brain injury, even when it looks mild, and it deserves the same protocol every time.”

Diplomatic: “I’d rather be overly cautious for a week than wrong about something that doesn’t get a second chance to be caught early.”

The line that works best in the moment reframes the conversation away from doubting the kid/parent, and toward the reason the protocol exists.: “I’m not benching him because I think he’s faking it or isn’t being truthful. I’m benching him because this is an injury where you can’t tell from the outside, and the cost of being wrong is too high.”